Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Amaro v. Astar Air Cargo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO


May 20, 2010

JOHN L AMARO PLAINTIFF,
v.
ASTAR AIR CARGO, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: B. Lynn Winmill Chief Judge United States District Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

The Court has before it a motion by defendant Astar to continue the hearing on the motion for preliminary injunction filed by plaintiff Amaro. The hearing is set for May 25, 2010, to determine whether the Court's TRO enjoining Astar from canceling Amaro's COBRA coverage should be dissolved or expanded into a preliminary injunction. Astar seeks additional time to explore settlement and investigate a matter explained below.

Amaro objects to any continuance because he believes Astar may try to terminate his coverage in the interim. He points to an Astar letter -- dated two days after the TRO was issued -- stating that the portion of his policy that reimbursed him for travel and lodging "has been termed." See Exhibit to Affidavit of Amaro.

The letter goes on to state that reimbursement would be made only through December 17, 2009, which might mean that this provision of the policy was "termed" near the end of 2009 rather than after the TRO was issued. That is not clear, however, and counsel have informed the Court that they are investigating this matter.

The Court's TRO was issued to ensure that no portion of Amaro's COBRA coverage is reduced, modified, "termed", cancelled, or changed in any way until the preliminary injunction motion is resolved. Because the Court will not permit Astar to take any such action, there is no reason to fear that Astar will terminate Amaro's coverage before the hearing. The Court will obviously be very interested in the outcome of the investigation by counsel into Astar's conduct.

Examining all the circumstances, the Court finds that a continuance is warranted. Amaro states that he is unavailable until September of 2010. Accordingly, the Court will set the hearing for September 8, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. in the Federal Courthouse in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.

ORDER

In accordance with the Memorandum Decision set forth above, NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the motion to continue (docket no. 28) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the hearing on preliminary injunction now set for May 25, 2010, is VACATED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that a new hearing on preliminary injunction be set for September 8, 2010, at 8:30 a.m. in the Federal Courthouse in Coeur d'Alene.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) presently in place (docket no. 12) enjoins Astar from canceling, reducing, modifying, terming, or changing in any way any portion of Amaro's COBRA coverage, and shall remain in effect until the preliminary injunction issue is resolved.

20100520

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.