UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
August 22, 2011
IN RE: FRESH AND PROCESS POTATOES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
The opinion of the court was delivered by: B. Lynn Winmill Chief U.S. District Court Judge
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO : 4:10-CV-00546-BLW 4:10-CV-00576-BLW Vander Heiden, et al v. United Potato Growers of America, Inc., et al. Rizzo, et al. v. United Potato Growers of America, Inc., et al.
The Court has before it the Unopposed Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Claims Against United Potato Growers of Canada (Dkt. 153 in Case No. 4:10-MD-2186-BLW, Dkt. 130 in Case No. 4:10-CV-00546-BLW, and Dkt. 147 in Case No. 4:10-CV-00576-BLW). Good cause appearing, the Court will grant the motion.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Supplemental Reply Brief attached as Exhibit A to the motion is deemed filed.
2. Indirect Purchases may file a sur-reply brief, no more than 3 pages in length, on or before August 29, 2011.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.