August 24, 2012
STATE OF IDAHO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
JAMES HOWARD BROWN,
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Richard D. Greenwood, District Judge.
2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 603
Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge
James Howard Brown pled guilty to forgery. I.C. §§ 18-3601, 18-3606. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed and the state agreed not to pursue an allegation that Brown was a persistent violator. The district court sentenced Brown to a unified term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years. Brown filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. Brown appeals.
A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the record, including the new information submitted with Brown's Rule 35 motion, we conclude no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court's order denying Brown's Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.