Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. Gregory M. Culet, District Judge.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lansing, Judge
2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 642
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
Judgment dismissing petition for post-conviction relief, affirmed.
Katherine Smith appeals from the district court's summary dismissal of her petition for post-conviction relief. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
In Smith's prior appeal, we described the circumstances of her convictions as follows:
The victim in this case owned an outdoor recreation store which employed Smith as an office manager. Over the course of Smith's one-year employment, she conducted a series of illegal transactions, forgeries, and thefts. Smith purchased several all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) and other equipment using her own in-house credit account. Smith then retained the equipment herself or sold it under the guise of it being her property without paying for the equipment. Smith often deleted any record of the transactions from her in-house account. Smith also deposited four company checks into her account which she authorized by forging the victim's signature on each check. Finally, an audit, completed after Smith's termination, revealed the victim also suffered a significant cash shortage during Smith's employment.
Smith was charged with ten counts of grand theft. I.C. §§ 18-2403(1); 18- 2407(1) (b). Pursuant to a plea agreement, Smith pled guilty to three of the counts and, in exchange for the dismissal of the other counts, agreed to pay restitution for all charged and uncharged criminal conduct against the victim. Smith was released on her own recognizance. Smith failed to appear on the date set for sentencing after having absconded to Alaska. The state located Smith in Alaska and extradited her to Idaho. Upon her return, Smith was sentenced to two concurrent unified terms of ten years, with minimum periods of confinement of two years, and a consecutive unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of one year. Smith filed a Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied.
The district court initially ordered Smith to pay the victim restitution in the amount of $273,882.65. The order was subject to review and alteration after an evidentiary hearing. Subsequently, the district court ordered the retailer to submit an amended affidavit in support of restitution. The affidavit asserted the value of the equipment taken, less the items returned, plus the actual lost wages and out- of-pocket losses resulting from the criminal conduct equaled $118,396.14. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court ordered Smith to pay restitution in the amount of $100,296.84.
State v. Smith, 144 Idaho 687, 690, 169 P.3d 275, 278 (Ct. App. 2007) (footnote omitted).
Smith then filed a pro se petition for post-conviction relief alleging, among other things, a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel that, she contended, rendered her guilty pleas constitutionally infirm. On a motion by the State, the district court summarily dismissed this and other claims and, after an ...