Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State of Idaho v. Jamie Lee Nappo

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO


October 1, 2012

STATE OF IDAHO,
PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JAMIE LEE NAPPO,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bannock County. Hon. Stephen S. Dunn, District Judge.

Per curiam.

2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 653

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eighteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of eight years, for first degree kidnapping and concurrent unified term of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of eight years, for attempted first degree murder, affirmed.

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

Jamie Lee Nappo pled guilty to first degree kidnapping, I.C. § 18-4502, and attempted first degree murder, I.C. §§ 18-4001, 18-4002, 18-4003, 18-306, and 18-204. The district court sentenced Nappo to a unified term of eighteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of eight years for first degree kidnapping and a current unified term of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of eight years, for attempted first degree murder. Nappo appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Nappo's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

20121001

© 1992-2012 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.