Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

William Jed Powell v. Eastern Idaho Railroad

December 7, 2012

WILLIAM JED POWELL,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
EASTERN IDAHO RAILROAD, L.L.C., AN IDAHO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; WATCO, INC., A MISSOURI CORPORATION; DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: B. Lynn Winmill Chief Judge United States District Court

AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

In accordance with the agreements reached in the telephone status conference held between counsel and the Court's staff on December 7, 2012, and to further the efficient administration of this matter,

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the deadlines that have not yet passed will be extended by two months as follows:

1. Dispositive Motion Deadline: All dispositive motions shall be filed by July 10, 2013.*fn1 This deadline will not be extended for Rule 56(d) issues, expert issues, discovery disputes, or for any other reason, absent a showing of compelling good cause.

a. This is the critical event for case management and will dictate when the trial will be set.

b. As provided below, a trial setting conference will be scheduled immediately following resolution of all dispositive motions. To facilitate a prompt trial setting, I will make every effort to schedule oral argument within 60 days and issue a decision within 30 days after the oral argument. If a decision is not issued within this time frame, I invite inquiry from counsel as to the status of the decision.

2. Discovery Plan: The parties intend to follow the schedule and process set forth in the Local Rules and FRCP.

5. Completion of Discovery: All discovery will be completed by June 19, 2013.This is a deadline for the completion of all discovery; it is not a deadline for discovery requests. Discovery requests must be made far enough in advance of this deadline to allow completion of the discovery by the deadline date. The parties may, by stipulation, agree to defer some trial-related discovery, such as discovery related to damages issue, until after I have ruled on any dispositive issues.

6. Disclosure of Experts:

a. The Plaintiff shall disclose experts intended to be called at trial on or before April 19, 2013.

a. The Defendant shall disclose the experts intended to be called at trial on or before May 20, 2013.

b. All rebuttal experts shall be identified on or before June 3, 2013.

7. Rules Governing Disclosure of Expert Witnesses: Within the deadlines for the disclosure of expert witnesses set out above, the parties shall also provide -- for each expert disclosed -- the report described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B), as modified by Local Rule 26.2(b). Supplementation to the expert witness report shall be done in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e)(1), keeping in mind the Court's admonition about not moving the dispositive motion deadline set forth earlier in this Order. Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2(b), expert witnesses will not be allowed to offer any opinion not disclosed in the mandatory Rule 26 disclosures, supplementation, or deposition. This includes rebuttal experts. No undisclosed expert rebuttal opinion testimony will be allowed at trial.

8. Scheduling of Trial and Pretrial Conference. Plaintiff's counsel shall contact In-Court Deputy Jamie Gearhart within one week following the entry of a decision on all pending dispositive motions to make arrangements for a telephone scheduling conference between counsel and me in which the trial and pretrial conference shall be set. If no dispositive motion is filed, Plaintiff's counsel shall immediately contact Ms. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.