January 7, 2013
STATE OF IDAHO,
MICHAEL A. MORENO,
Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bannock County. Hon. Robert C. Naftz, District Judge.
2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 309
Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for robbery, affirmed.
Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge
Michael A. Moreno pled guilty to robbery. I.C. §§ 18-6501, 18-6502. In exchange for his guilty plea, a sentencing enhancement for use of a firearm was dismissed. The district court sentenced Moreno to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. Moreno appeals.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Moreno's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.