Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. John P. Luster, District Judge.
2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 403
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
Judgment of conviction and current, unified sentence of ten years, with two and one-half years determinate, for attempted strangulation, affirmed; judgment of conviction and concurrent, unified sentence of three years, with one year determinate, for intimidating a witness, affirmed.
Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge
In docket number 40003, Levi Wood Mills pled guilty to attempted strangulation. Idaho Code § 18-923. In docket number 40004, Mills entered an Alford*fn1 plea to intimidating a witness.
I.C. § 18-2604. The district court sentenced Mills to concurrent terms: a unified term of ten years, with two and one-half years determinate, for the attempted strangulation conviction and a unified term of three years, with one year determinate, for the intimidating a witness conviction.
Mills appeals both cases, contending his sentences are excessive. The two cases have been consolidated on appeal.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Mill's judgments of conviction and ...