May 14, 2013
STATE OF IDAHO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
CHRISTOPHER LEE DEIKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. Renae J. Hoff, District Judge.
2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 490
Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty-five years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen years, affirmed.
Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge
Christopher Lee Deike pled guilty to sexual abuse of a child under the age of sixteen years. Idaho Code § 18-1506(a). The district court sentenced Deike to a unified term of twenty-five years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years. Deike appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Deike's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
© 1992-2013 VersusLaw Inc.