Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hausladen v. Knoche

Court of Appeals of Idaho

December 12, 2013

FRANK WILLIAM HAUSLADEN, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SHARI COLENE KNOCHE, fka DAWSON, Defendant, and JOHN H. SAHLIN, Judgment Creditor on Appeal, Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 637S

SUBSTITUTE OPINION THE COURT'S PRIOR OPINION DATED AUGUST 23, 2013, IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. John P. Luster, District Judge.

Order of the district court, on intermediate appeal, dismissing appeal from the magistrate's order awarding parenting coordinator fees, reversed and remanded.

Frank William Hausladen, Jr., Sandpoint, pro se appellant.

John H. Sahlin, Coeur d'Alene, pro se respondent.

MELANSON, Judge

Frank William Hausladen, Jr. appeals from the district court's order dismissing his appeal from the magistrate's determination that Hausladen was required to pay John H. Sahlin parenting coordinator fees. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand.

I.

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Hausladen and Shari Colene Knoche are the parents of a minor child. Their respective custody rights and child support obligations have been the subject of numerous orders and order modifications over a period of years. On February 2, 2005, the magistrate entered an order modifying custody in which Sahlin was appointed to act as parenting coordinator. Sahlin attempted to resolve the disagreements of the parents. On January 11, 2006, the magistrate entered an order terminating Sahlin's appointment. Thereafter, on May 17, 2006, Sahlin filed a motion alleging Hausladen failed to pay his parenting coordinator fees and sought a court order requiring Hausladen to do so. Hausladen objected. Following a hearing on June 5, 2006, the magistrate granted Sahlin's motion and required Hausladen to pay Sahlin $667.50. Hausladen appealed to the district court, which affirmed the magistrate. Hausladen appealed to this Court, which reversed the district court's decision. Sahlin filed a petition for review with the Idaho Supreme Court, which was granted. The Court vacated the district court's order affirming the magistrate and remanded for a determination as to whether Sahlin was entitled to payment pursuant to I.C. § 32-717D(3) and I.R.C.P. 16(l)(11). Hausladen v. Knoche, 149 Idaho 449, 454, 235 P.3d 399, 404 (2010). On remand, the magistrate required Hausladen to pay Sahlin $667.50 plus statutory interest. Hausladen appealed to the district court, which dismissed the appeal. Hausladen again appeals.

II.

ANALYSIS


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.