December 31, 2013
STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent,
THOMAS RICHARD MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.
2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 808
Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. George A. Southworth, District Judge.
Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.
Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge.
Thomas Richard Moore pled guilty to aiding and abetting malicious injury to property. I.C. § 18-7001. The district court sentenced Moore to a unified term of three years, with a minimum period of one and one-half years. Moore filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. Moore appeals.
A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the record, including the new information submitted with Moore's Rule 35 motion, we conclude no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court's order denying Moore's Rule 35 motion is affirmed.