January 6, 2014
STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent,
MELISSA ANNE HERNANDEZ, aka STEVENSON, Defendant-Appellant.
2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 306
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of two and one-half years, for felony driving under the influence of alcohol with a persistent violator sentencing enhancement, affirmed.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly E. Smith, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.
Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge
Melissa Anne Hernandez was convicted of felony driving under the influence of alcohol, Idaho Code §§ 18-8004, 18-8005(6), with a persistent violator sentencing enhancement, I.C. § 19-2514. The district court sentenced Hernandez to a unified term of fifteen years with a minimum period of confinement of two and one-half years. She filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence which was denied. Hernandez appeals, contending that her sentence is excessive.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Hernandez's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.