Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Joseph v. Boise State Univ.

United States District Court, D. Idaho

February 21, 2014

THUY P. JOSEPH, Plaintiff,
v.
BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants

Page 929

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 930

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 931

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 932

Thuy P Joseph, Plaintiff, Pro se, Boise, ID.

For Boise State University, also known as BSU, Defendant: Michael Edward Kelly, LEAD ATTORNEY, Kelly, Talboy & Simmons PA, Boise, ID; Nathan Spear Ohler, LEAD ATTORNEY, Lopez and Kelly, PLLC, Boise, ID.

OPINION

Page 933

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Honorable Edward J. Lodge, U.S. District Judge.

On August 13, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Mikel H. Williams issued a Report and Recommendation (" Report" ), recommending tat Defendant Boise State University's Second Motion to Dismiss be granted. Any party may challenge the Magistrate Judge's proposed recommendation by filing written objections within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district court must then " make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Id. The district court may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations made by the magistrate. Id.; see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

Plaintiff filed objections to the Report arguing 1) the Magistrate Judge misinterpreted Plaintiff's allegation, 2) leave to amend should be granted, 3) substantial evidence exists showing the Plaintiff was treated differently based on her race, 4) Boise State University failed to comply with the guidelines set forth by the Department of Health and Welfare, and 5) the Magistrate Judge improperly granted the Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. 41.)[1] The Court has considered the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.