United States District Court, D. Idaho
January 15, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
JONATHAN LYNN HENERY and BEAU EDWARD HANSEN, Defendants.
B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief District Judge.
The Court has before it Defendant Henery's Motion to Suppress Defendant Jonathan Lynn Henery's Statements (Dkt. 64), and Defendant Hansen's Motion to Suppress Statements Made (Dkt. 66). The Government responded to the motions by indicating that it does not intend to offer either Hansen's statements or Henery's statements at trial in its case-in-chief. Accordingly, the Court will grant the motions, and preclude the Government from using the defendants' statements in its case-in-chief.
The Government reserved its right to use the statements to impeach the defendants if they testify at trial. It has been this Court's practice to follow Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent that a defendant's voluntary statement, even if obtained in violation of Miranda, is admissible as impeachment evidence. U.S. v. Gomez, 725 F.3d 1121, 1126 (9th Cir. 2013) ( citing Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 307 (1985). If the defendants intend to argue a different position, defense counsel should contact the Court's staff to determine a short briefing schedule to address the matter before trial.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Defendant Henery's Motion to Suppress Defendant Jonathan Lynn Henery's Statements (Dkt. 64) is GRANTED as explained above.
2. Defendant Hansen's Motion to Suppress Statements Made (Dkt. 66) is GRANTED as explained above.