Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Ramsey

Court of Appeals of Idaho

December 31, 2015

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
JAMES BUTLER RAMSEY, Defendant-Appellant

2015 Opinion No. 90

Page 1201

Editorial Note:

This decision is not final until exception of the 21 day petition for rehearing period. Pursuant to rule 118 of the Idaho Appellate Rules

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge.

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion to correct an illegal sentence, affirmed.

James Butler Ramsey, Boise, Pro se, appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Mark W. Olson, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

OPINION

GUTIERREZ, Judge

James Butler Ramsey appeals from the district court's denial of his Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion to correct an illegal sentence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2002, Ramsey pled guilty to robbery, Idaho Code § § 18-6501; grand theft by possession of stolen property, I.C. § § 18-2403(4), 18-2407(1); and aggravated assault, I.C. § § 18-901(b), 18-905(a). The district court imposed a unified life sentence with twenty years determinate for robbery, a concurrent fourteen years determinate for grand theft, and a concurrent five years determinate for aggravated assault. Ramsey appealed his sentences, alleging they were excessive, which this Court affirmed. State v. Ramsey, 139 Idaho 508, 80 P.3d 1109 (Ct.App. 2003) (unpublished).[1]

In December 2014, Ramsey filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Idaho Criminal Rule 35(a), arguing that his sentence for his robbery conviction was illegal. At the same time, he filed a motion for appointment of counsel and a motion requesting the court to take judicial notice of a case pending in federal district court.[2] The district court denied Ramsey's motion as untimely filed pursuant to I.C.R. 35(b). The court also denied Ramsey's pending motions for the court to appoint counsel ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.