Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Bradford

United States District Court, D. Idaho

February 28, 2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
JASON BRADFORD, Defendant.

          MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

          B. Lynn Winmill, Chief U.S. District Court Judge.

         I

         INTRODUCTION

         The Court has before it a motion to suppress. The Court heard evidence on September 28 and December 14, 2017, and the parties submitted supplemental briefing after each hearing. For the reasons explained below, the Court will deny the motion.

         II

         FACTUAL BACKGROUND

         In the early morning hours of January 26, 2017, several Boise Police Department officers, including Officers Mitch Tiner and Jason Green, were surveilling a suspected drug-trafficking residence in Boise. At around 4:00 a.m., Officer Green saw a Ford Bronco pull up to the house and park on the street. The driver, later identified as Defendant Jason Bradford, went inside for between 15 and 40 minutes, then walked outside carrying something in his hands. Before Bradford got into the Bronco and drove off, he handed the object he had just been carrying to one of two people who had walked outside with him. The Bronco then left the residence but returned within a minute or so. Bradford stepped outside the car and was met by one of the two people who had been standing outside with him earlier. He retrieved the object he had been carrying earlier, and drove off again, this time without his headlights on.

         Officer Green did not follow the Bronco when it left because he was more interested in another vehicle that was parked at the residence. Nevertheless, he radioed other officers on duty to look out for traffic violations committed by the Bronco.

         Approximately one-half mile from the residence, Officer Tiner pulled over the Bronco for failing to maintain its lane. Bradford told Officer Tiner he had dropped his phone, which explained why he swerved out of his lane. For the first three minutes and thirty-four seconds of the stop, Officer Tiner spoke with Bradford about this traffic violation, Bradford's parole status, and the Bronco. See Ex. B., Tiner Bodycam Video, Dkt. 17-3, at 0:01-3:34. Bradford informed Officer Tiner that he was on parole for attempted robbery, grand theft, and a firearms offense.

         Roughly three minutes and forty-five seconds after pulling over Bradford, Officer Tiner returned to his patrol car, communicated with dispatch, pulled out Bradford's driver's license, and began writing a citation. Before he returned to his patrol car, two other officers, Michelle Havens and Jessica Perkins, arrived on the scene. Officer Havens positioned herself at the passenger window of the Bronco before Officer Tiner returned to his patrol car to write the citation.

         A fourth officer, Jason Green, arrived with his drug dog, Jackson, while Officer Tiner was in his car filling out the citation. Officer Green arrived to conduct a dog sniff of Bradford's car. Before he did that, however, he walked up to Officer Tiner, and the two had a brief conversation. The first 26 seconds of the conversation were recorded, and this is what the officers said:

Officer Green: Did you use the lights?
Officer Tiner: Yeah.
Officer Green: What's that?
Officer Tiner: Uhm, (inaudible) fail to maintain lane. When he was coming down, he hit center, uh, lanes and then all the way over into the solid white. I walked up and he was like, “I'm sorry, I dropped my phone. I was trying to get my phone off my feet.”
Officer Green: Did you uh, uh, did you tell him about lights?
Officer Tiner: No.
Officer Green: Okay, I was just thinking, if we don't use ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.